Pradosh Rao Turning Approver to Aid Prosecution in Renukaswamy Murder Case

Accused number 14, Pradosh S Rao, turning approver in the Renukaswamy murder case could prove crucial for the prosecution in the Bengaluru trial against Kannada actor Darshan and others.
While investigators have already gathered circumstantial evidence, the approver's statement is expected to help corroborate those findings and clearly establish the sequence of events leading up to the crime.
A public prosecutor, speaking on condition of anonymity, stated that an approver is a co-accused who turns witness for the prosecution. In return for a pardon, the individual agrees to make a full and truthful disclosure regarding the offence and the specific involvement of other accused persons.
Under Section 343 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), a competent court holds the authority to tender a pardon to an accomplice in serious offences, subject to specific statutory conditions. If the approver fails to support the prosecution with proper testimony and evidence during the proceedings, the prosecution can seek action against him. The approver can also face a perjury case and be tried separately for providing false evidence.
Senior advocate Shyamsundar MS explained that in cases where an accused played a relatively minor role—such as driving a vehicle or being present at the crime scene—that individual may become an approver. When direct evidence is limited, the approver's testimony, combined with supporting material, significantly strengthens the case.
To initiate the process, an accused wishing to turn approver must submit an application. If the prosecution determines after review that the disclosure aids the case, it can plead before the court to grant a pardon. Once pardoned, the individual transitions into a witness and is subject to cross-examination.
Former superintendent of police SK Umesh noted that accused persons typically turn approver to reduce liability or avoid conviction when their level of guilt is comparatively lower. Investigating officers evaluate both the gravity of the offence and the specific role played by the accused before considering making them an approver.